🛡️ Defense & Government Contracting
CMMC + AI = Compounded Compliance Risk

CMMC doesn't cover AI.
Your DoD contract depends on both.

Defense contractors are adding AI tools to design workflows, proposal generation, and supply chain analysis — while still chasing CMMC Level 2 and 3 certification. The intersection of AI governance and CMMC compliance is a gap most contractors haven't addressed. Your C3PAO assessor will find it.

300K+
defense contractors in the DIB required to achieve CMMC compliance by 2025
0
CMMC controls that explicitly address AI governance — your AI risk is uncharted territory
$86B
in DoD contracts at risk annually from non-compliant cybersecurity and governance postures
2x
compliance burden when AI governance gaps compound existing CMMC readiness gaps

Three compounding risks
for defense contractors using AI

CMMC doesn't have an AI chapter yet — but that doesn't mean AI tools are out of scope. Every AI tool touching CUI, FCI, or proposal data creates new attack surface and compliance exposure your assessor will probe.

🔐

CUI in AI Tools

AI tools ingesting Controlled Unclassified Information — contract requirements, technical specifications, RFP data — create CUI handling obligations your CMMC System Security Plan likely doesn't address.

⚡ CMMC / CUI Risk
📡

Third-Party AI as Attack Surface

Commercial AI tools (Copilot, ChatGPT, vendor AI platforms) connected to contractor systems expand the assessed environment boundary — and potentially invalidate your scoping decisions.

⚡ Scoping / Boundary Risk
📄

Undocumented AI Processes

Proposal generation, contract analysis, and technical writing using AI tools creates undocumented processes that assessors will ask about. "We use ChatGPT sometimes" is not a system description.

⚡ Documentation Gap
CMMC + AI

The Intersection No One Is Talking About

CMMC Level 2 maps to NIST SP 800-171 — 110 practices focused on protecting CUI. NIST AI RMF adds a governance layer for AI systems. NIST CSF 2.0 provides the cybersecurity GRC backbone — Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover — that ties both together. No single framework covers the full risk picture for a defense contractor deploying AI tools. Altiri builds the bridge across all three — so your CMMC assessment, your AI governance posture, and your cybersecurity program tell a consistent story. Learn how GRC bridges cybersecurity and compliance →

AI Governance That
Survives a C3PAO Assessment

Altiri maps your AI tools and processes to CMMC boundary requirements, NIST AI RMF controls, and DoD AI Ethics Principles — giving you a defensible posture for your next assessment and your next contract bid.

01

AI Tool Inventory & Scoping

Catalog every AI tool in your environment. Assess scope impact on CMMC System Security Plan. Identify CUI touchpoints and data flows through AI systems.

02

CMMC + NIST CSF + NIST AI RMF Overlay

Map AI tool risk against NIST SP 800-171 access control, NIST CSF 2.0 cybersecurity controls, and NIST AI RMF governance functions simultaneously. Identify gaps and remediation paths across all three frameworks at once.

03

SSP & Policy Documentation

Update your System Security Plan to accurately describe AI tool use, data flows, and controls. Build AI-specific policies that satisfy assessor inquiries.

04

Ongoing vCAIO Leadership

Fractional Chief AI Officer keeping your AI governance current as DoD AI policy evolves and new tools enter your environment.

What You Get
Defense Contractor AI Governance Package
AI Tool Inventory & Scope Impact Analysis — every tool, every CUI touchpoint
CMMC-AI Gap Assessment — where your AI use creates CMMC exposure
SSP AI Addendum — document AI tools in your System Security Plan
NIST AI RMF Gap Analysis — Govern, Map, Measure, Manage workstreams
NIST CSF 2.0 Cybersecurity Controls — Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover mapped to your AI systems and CMMC assessed environment
CUI Handling Policy for AI — explicit policy for AI tools processing CUI/FCI
Third-Party AI Risk Framework — vendor assessment for commercial AI tools
Assessor-Ready Documentation — evidence packages for C3PAO review
PP
Patrick Parker
Fractional vCAIO & AI Governance Lead
CMMC Registered Practitioner
NIST 800-171 Expert
NIST AI RMF Practitioner
Defense Contractor GRC
CUI Handling Compliance

"Defense contractors are in a compliance squeeze — CMMC Level 2 certification demands are already intense, and now AI tools are creating a second set of questions that no existing framework answers cleanly. The contractors who figure out this intersection now will have a competitive advantage in every contract bid that includes security attestation requirements."

🎖️

CMMC Registered Practitioner (RP)

Certified through the CMMC Accreditation Body (CyberAB) as a Registered Practitioner. Guides defense contractors through CMMC Level 1, 2, and 3 readiness — including scoping, gap analysis, and remediation planning.

🏭

Defense Contractor Consulting

Hands-on consulting with DIB contractors navigating CMMC readiness alongside active contract performance. Understands the operational realities of compliance in a proposal-driven environment.

📐

NIST Framework Expertise

Deep expertise across NIST SP 800-171, NIST CSF, and NIST AI RMF — the three frameworks that intersect for AI-using defense contractors. Builds governance programs that satisfy all three simultaneously.

Don't let AI tools become your next CMMC finding.

Take the free AI Readiness Assessment and understand your AI governance posture before your C3PAO assessor does. 15 minutes — immediate results — no obligation.

Free assessment · No commitment · Results delivered immediately